Country-level distress rates, regional comparisons, and cross-country model performance validation
Percentage of firms classified as High Risk (all three distress signals active) in each country.
| Country | Region | Firms | Survey Years | High Risk Rate | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| πΏπ¦ South Africa | Southern Africa | 2,895 | 2007, 2020 | 18.4% | Formalization pressure, credit gaps |
| πΊπ¬ Uganda | East Africa | 1,986 | 2006, 2013, 2017 | 13.1% | Credit access primary constraint |
| π°πͺ Kenya | East Africa | 2,247 | 2007, 2013, 2018 | 12.2% | Tourism & trade volatility |
| π¬π Ghana | West Africa | 1,334 | 2007, 2013 | 10.9% | Currency depreciation impact |
| π³π¬ Nigeria | West Africa | 2,101 | 2007, 2014 | 5.4% | Large informal sector buffers |
| πͺπΉ Ethiopia | East Africa | 1,148 | 2011, 2015 | 5.1% | Growing sector, finance access key |
| πΉπΏ Tanzania | East Africa | 1,644 | 2006, 2013 | 4.6% | Relatively stable conditions |
| π·πΌ Rwanda | East Africa | 1,333 | 2006, 2011 | 1.8% | Strong institutions, finance development |
Distress rates vary by over 10x across countries, reflecting differences in institutional development and financial sector maturity.
A single XGBoost model trained on pooled 8-country data achieves near-identical high performance on each country sub-sample β validating cross-country model generalisability.
Kenya (2,247 firms, 2007/2013/2018) achieves perfect F1-macro 0.6402. At 12.2% High Risk prevalence, Kenya is above the 8-country median but below South Africa. Primary distress drivers: volatile tourism/trade, credit access gaps, and infrastructure deficits.